×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

2050 Douglas County Transportation Plan

Review the DRAFT Plan!

Your local government is paving the way for the future with the 2050 Transportation Plan. After input from community members and local stakeholders, this Draft Plan was developed as a multi-modal transportation strategy that guides investment of public funds in the transportation system. Help us review the Draft Plan and share your feedback!

See more about the project at www.douglas.co.us/.

Directions – PLEASE READ!  

  • For the best viewing experience, please select Full Screen Mode for best readability. 
  • Navigate between pages by scrolling through the document. 
  • Please review each section and leave comments- comments can be made on top of graphics or maps, over text, and in the margins. 
  • Comments save automatically after clicking “Post Comment.”  
  • View and reply to other comments to start a discussion.  
  • You may visit and comment on the document multiple times. 

We appreciate your time! 

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment


Idea
This section of 105 is a County Highway. The State Highway portion of 105 is only between Hwy 67 and Wolfensberger Road
Idea
Extend Noe Road paving to Perry Park Road / County Hwy 105
Idea
Add Pave Best Road. Greenland and Best should both be paved to ensure a solid E/W connection between I025 and Hwy 83. Winter maintenance is challenging and paving both strengthens resiliency of this connection.
Idea
This number should be around $30 million (Pavement Management $17 m, concrete replacement $4 m, Signals / ITS $1.4 m, signal replacement $2 mi, snow $4 m)
Idea
I suggest "The growing list of improvements carried forward from the prior plan indicates that the growing mobility needs…”
Idea
I suggest revising to "being carried forward from"
Idea
This paragraph seems to need additional explanation.
Typo
perhaps should be "projects"?
Typo
Need to clean these two graphics up
Idea
Is this specific project listed as an example, or is this considered the top priority project of this type? It seems like it is an example, perhaps some additional discussion or description needs to be added to clarify this.
Typo
Need to clean up the table - add comma's where needed
Idea
I like the concept of the chart but the graphic could be sharpened up to better fit the other graphics in the document.
Idea
Encroachment into wildlife corridors has an impact as well.
Question
Wildlife/car impacts?
Question
Why are these excluded?
Idea
We are glad this language is included.
Question
Does this include wildlife/car impacts?
Idea
and wildlife movement!
Question
Should this line be here?
Question
safety records include wildlife crashes?
Question
I might have missed this but what's the DRCOG?
Idea
Rural areas are also the the majority of wildlife on roadways impacts people's safety.
Question
With respect to the CMP, Wildlife Corridors Section 9, how is this DCTP aligned to protect wildlife along roadways?